Readings for the 5th Sunday in Ordinary Time: Isaiah 58:7-10; Psalm112:4-9; 1 Corinthians 2:1-5; Matthew 5:13-16.
For the past two weeks, I’ve been saying (here and here) something that makes some people nervous: that the teachings of Jesus and the practice of the earliest Christian communities contain themes that can only be described as Marxist, socialist, even communist. Not in the caricatured sense tossed around on talk shows. Not in the Cold War sense. But in the deeply biblical sense—rooted in shared bread, structural justice, and God’s bias toward the poor.
Today’s readings don’t retreat from that claim. They double down.
Let’s start with the prophet and then move on to the Psalms, Paul, and Jesus.
Isaiah 58: God’s Politics of Bread
In Book of Isaiah 58, God is not interested in private piety detached from public justice. Isaiah says: Share your bread with the hungry. Shelter the oppressed and the homeless. Clothe the naked. Remove oppression from your midst.
This is not charity as a hobby. This is social reorganization. The prophet does not say, “Pray more and the hungry will be spiritually nourished.” He says: share your bread. Bread is economic. Bread is material. Bread is about who owns what and who eats.
The prophet assumes something structural: hunger is not accidental. Homelessness is not random. Oppression is not an individual moral failure; it is embedded in systems. And the remedy is not spiritualization—it is redistribution.
Psalm112:4-9
The Responsorial Psalm is often read as describing personal virtue. But listen carefully.
“Lavishly he gives to the poor.”
“He conducts his affairs with justice.”
The psalmist describes someone whose economic behavior is transformed. The just person lends without exploitation. He is not shaken by “evil report.” He is steadfast in justice.
This is not the portrait of a nationalist strongman obsessed with dominance. It is not the image of someone defending borders, hoarding wealth, or equating divine favor with market success. It is the image of someone who destabilizes unjust systems by generosity.
Franz Hinkelammert, the German-Latin American economist and theologian, warned that modern capitalism turns the market into an idol—demanding sacrifice of human lives in the name of “efficiency.” Hinkelammert argued that when profit becomes sacred, people become expendable.
Psalm 112 offers a different sacred center: the poor.
The just person’s heart is firm not because he has secured his investments—but because he trusts in the Lord while giving away resources.
That is profoundly anti-idolatrous. And therefore, profoundly political.
Paul in Corinth: Power in Weakness
In First Epistle to the Corinthians 2, Paul says something revolutionary:
“I did not come with sublimity of words or wisdom… but with Jesus Christ, and him crucified.”
The crucified one is not a nationalist hero. He is an executed victim of empire. (Crucifixion was the form of capital punishment reserved for insurrectionists.) Paul refuses rhetorical domination. He refuses identification with the elite. He centers the cross—an instrument of state terror.
Liberation theology has always emphasized this: the cross reveals God’s identification with victims. God is not neutral between oppressor and oppressed. God is found among those crucified by history.
Paul’s refusal of “persuasive words of wisdom” is also a critique of ideological manipulation. Faith must not rest on elite rhetoric, but on divine power manifest in solidarity with those empire hates and kills.
That is why Christian nationalism feels threatened by the cross.
Christian nationalism prefers triumph. It prefers cultural dominance. It prefers flags draped over crosses.
But Paul gives us a broken body instead.
Jesus: Salt and Light
Now the Gospel.
In Gospel of Matthew 5, Jesus says: “You are the salt of the earth.” “You are the light of the world.”
Salt preserves from decay. Light exposes what is hidden.
This is not a call to privatized spirituality. It is a call to public transformation.
Notice: your light must shine so that others see your good deeds.
What deeds?
Isaiah has already told us: feeding the hungry, housing the homeless, dismantling oppression.
Jesus is not inventing a new ethic here. He is intensifying Isaiah’s.
A city set on a mountain cannot be hidden. This is a communal image. It evokes not isolated believers but a visible alternative society.
The earliest Christian communities took this seriously. They held goods in common. They redistributed resources so that “there was not a needy person among them.” That sounds dangerously close to socialism—because it is.
And here is where we must address the tension with voices like Charlie Kirk‘s, which argue that Christianity is fundamentally about individual salvation, private morality, and national strength.
In that framework, the market is sacred, property rights are absolute, and any talk of structural redistribution is labeled “Marxist” as if that ends the conversation.
But here’s the irony: Isaiah sounds more Marxist than the commentators who condemn Marx. Jesus sounds more socialist than the pundits who wave Bibles at rallies.
When Christians share bread, dismantle oppression, and organize communal life around the needs of the poor, they are not betraying the Gospel. They are embodying it.
Why This Theology Was Targeted
This is why liberation theology (i.e. authentic biblical theology informed by modern scripture scholarship) was perceived as dangerous.
In the early 1980s, the Reagan administration and policy strategists behind what became known as the Santa Fe Document explicitly identified liberation theology as a threat in Latin America. It aligned peasants and workers with biblical faith. It exposed structural injustice. It challenged U.S.-backed regimes.
So, it had to be neutralized.
The strategy was twofold: (1) Portray liberation theology as “Marxist infiltration,” and (2) Promote a privatized, depoliticized Christianity compatible with neoliberal economics.
The result?
- U.S.-sponsored death squads.
- Assassinations of priests, nuns, and catechists. (Recall the slogan in El Salvador, “Be a patriot; kill a priest.”)
- A generation of Christians taught to fear the word “justice” if it implied systemic change.
- A generation trained to equate patriotism with piety.
- A generation suspicious of any theology that speaks of class.
And so, the Left weakened—because it surrendered theological imagination — and often faith itself. Meanwhile, the Right grew strong—because it wrapped market ideology in biblical language.
But Isaiah is still there.
Paul is still there.
Jesus is still there.
And they continue to say: share your bread. Remove oppression. Shine with good deeds.
The Conflict Today
The conflict is not between Christianity and atheism. It is between two versions of Christianity. One blesses empire. The other stands with the crucified. One Christianity defends borders above human beings. The other remembers that Jesus himself was a refugee. One Christianity fears the language of class. The other recognizes that the Bible is saturated with it—rich and poor, debtor and creditor, slave and free.
Christian nationalism proclaims, “Make the nation great again.” Biblical theology proclaims, “Make the poor visible again.”
Christian nationalism identifies God with power. Biblical theology identifies God with victims.
And today’s readings make clear which side the biblical text leans toward.
Salt That Has Not Lost Its Taste
Jesus warns: salt can lose its taste.
What does that mean? It means faith can lose its transformative power. It can become bland, domesticated, harmless. When Christianity ceases to confront structural injustice, it becomes tasteless. When the Church fears being called “socialist” more than it fears ignoring the hungry, it has lost its saltiness. When Christians defend systems that produce homelessness while quoting Scripture about personal morality, the light dims.
But when bread is shared, light breaks forth like dawn. When oppression is removed, darkness becomes midday. When communities embody economic justice—God says, “Here I am.”
That is the promise of Isaiah.
That is the power of the cross.
That is the calling of salt and light.
Conclusion
For the past two weeks, I’ve suggested that Marx did not invent concern for the poor. The prophets did. Jesus did. The earliest Christians did.
Marx analyzed exploitation. Isaiah condemned it. Jesus embodied resistance to it.
To acknowledge this is not to baptize every socialist experiment in history. It is not to deny the complexities of economics. It is simply to be honest about the text.
The Bible does not defend hoarding. It does not sanctify inequality. It does not idolize the nation-state. It calls for justice. And justice, in Scripture, is not abstract. It is bread, shelter, clothing, and dignity.
So, if someone says that such preaching is “Marxist,” perhaps the better question is: why does Marx sound like Isaiah?
If someone claims that Christian faith is about national power, perhaps we should ask: what do we do with the crucified Messiah?
If someone insists that the Church should avoid politics, perhaps we should re-read Isaiah 58.
The readings today are not subtle. They do not whisper. They’re about salt and light, bread and justice, capital punishment and resurrection.
They do not endorse empire, domination or nationalism disguised as faith. Instead, they announce that authentic worship is inseparable from economic justice.
And when that justice begins to take shape—when bread is shared, when the afflicted are satisfied—then, Isaiah promises, “your light shall rise in the darkness.”
May we have the courage to let it shine.
About Things That Matter 