(This is the fifth in a series of Monday postings on the historical Jesus. Together the pieces are intended to assist those who wish to “dig deeper” into the scholarly foundations of postmodern faith and to understand the methodology behind the postings on the blog site.)
The modern scripture scholarship we’re exploring here has discovered that there were five stages in the unfolding of the tradition we encounter in the Christian Testament. Understanding these stages is important for grasping the difference between the Jesus of history this series is attempting to explain and the Jesus of faith who has come to dominate our understandings of the prophet from Nazareth.
The five stages I’m referring to include (1) the actual life of Jesus, (2) his disciples post-crucifixion “resurrection experience,” (3) the first proclamation of the disciples’ post-resurrection faith (called “kerygma,” a Greek word for proclamation), (4) a long period of oral tradition, and (5) the production of written reflections on the believing community’s experience of Jesus including his response to problems he did not himself encounter during his life. At each of these stages the Jesus of history recedes further from the Jesus of faith.
Over the next few weeks, I’ll devote a column a week to briefly exploring each one of the stages just referenced. This week I’ll begin with some observations about what we’re able to say about the life of Jesus by applying the criteria for discernment I tried to explain last week. You’ll recall that those criteria were: (1) Multiple attestation from independent sources, (2) Dissimilarity from the apparent immediate interests of biblical authors , (3) Semitisms, (4)Content reflecting the circumstances of the early church rather than of Jesus, (5)Vividness of description, and (5) Coherence with acts or statements otherwise identified as authentically attributable to Jesus. Additionally, relevant scholarly insights are derived from the modern disciplines of linguistics, archeology, textual criticism, comparative religion, history, psychology, economics, physics, biology, medicine, etc.
Application of these criteria uncovers a Jesus who is:
(1) A teacher of unconventional wisdom: Jesus’ teachings largely deviated from those of the rabbis of his time. In contrast to them, we would say he was extremely liberal in his interpretation of the Jewish tradition and especially of its laws. Law was not a priority for Jesus. In fact we might say he understood himself as fulfilling the Law by breaking laws and teaching others to do so. His priority was a Higher Law which put positive response to human need ahead of legal requirements. Jesus method of teaching such values was parable and story.
(2) A faith healer. Jesus was more than a miracle worker. As scholars point out, miracle workers in the first century of the Common Era were “a dime a dozen.” All “great men” – including emperors and kings – were expected to work miracles and were remembered as doing so. It would have been remarkable had Jesus not been identified as a miracle worker. Instead, Jesus was a faith healer of extraordinary power. His presence and words were able to evoke the healing powers present within all human beings.
(3) A prophetic critic. Jesus was not a priest or a king. He was a prophet. Prophets were social critics. So Jesus addressed the problems of his day including Roman imperialism and the collaboration with that system of exploitation on the part of the religious “leadership” of his day – its priests and kings.
(4) A Jewish mystic. Mystics are spiritual practitioners and teachers who believe that: (a) a spark of the divine resides within each human being; (b) humans can know that divinity and live from that place within them; (c) it is the purpose of life to do so, and (d) once that purpose is realized, the enlightened human perceives the spark of the divine in all of creation and lives accordingly.
(5) A movement founder. Jesus was not a Christian. He was a Jew. His purpose was to reform Judaism. His specific interest was to proclaim a Jubilee Year which included debt forgiveness and land reform on behalf of the poor. Following his death, Jesus’ Jewish reform movement evolved into a “church” overwhelmingly composed on non-Jews.
Next Week: Step One in the Development of the Christian Tradition: A portrait of the Jesus of History.
About Things That Matter 
This reminds me of Woody Allen and …Every thing you always wanted to know about sex but were afraid to ask…. I mean of course ‘the Jesus in his time.”
It would be great when you finish the series you give us the link for each blog on this subject, which you say it the fifth, then we wont need to buy the book!!! Or we would have an option.
Jim
LikeLike
Mike…one further comment…just odd thoughts.
A few things struck me which may shock people as a comment to the blog.
Not sure if you read any of Castaneda’s books…about the spiritual, the mystical and how little we know about the Light which surrounds us….and coincidentally the common Spark which is in us all….all are made in gods likeness….the Shinto/Celtic idea of a god being in the river the hill, mountain…..one time I saw near my home here a priest at a ceremony at the river head in a town that was to begin annual work at cleaning the slime etc from the river bed…in many places the river took care of all household chores and re-entered purified its river at the end of the village …the priest was there to apologize to the god for the temp inconvenience. Now of course he charges.
Your last post is almost like an essential class-book for our schools….not sure where it is all going but its a good ride. For me at some stage the blog has to include the great mystery of the early books of the bible…whether it has any historical context or is it all allegory waiting to be revealed or us to evolve…samo samo just thoughts…jim
LikeLike