Readings for Easter Sunday: ACTS 10: 34A, 37-43; PS 118 1-2, 16-17, 22-23, COL 3L 1-4; JN 20: 1-9. http://usccb.org/bible/readings/042014.cfm
On this Easter Sunday, it’s appropriate to address the reality of Jesus’ resurrection. Did he really rise from the dead? Or is that doctrine simply a remnant of childhood like belief in the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus? And for those of us concerned with social justice, what can the Bible’s resurrection stories possibly mean?
This reflection tries to address those questions.
In response to the one about the factuality of Jesus’ resurrection, let’s look at what the Christian tradition itself tells us. It indicates that the resurrection accounts are not based on the physical resuscitation of a corpse. The experiences there were more visionary and likely metaphorical.
As for the sociopolitical meaning of Jesus’ rising from the dead, Pope Francis addresses that question quite meaningfully in his Apostolic Exhortation, Evangelii Gaudium. We’ll get to that presently.
First however consider the nature of the resurrection traditions themselves. They were inspired by women and emerged from the bleakest depths of despair not unlike what many progressives might be feeling today as our fondest hopes appear further than ever from fulfillment – as a rogue U.S. empire wreaks havoc and its savage economy destroys the planet.
Think about it.
Following Jesus’ death, his disciples returned to business as usual – fishing most prominently. It was their darkest hour. Yeshua, the one on whom they had pinned their hopes for the liberation of Israel from Roman domination was dead. Their world had ended.
But then unexpectedly, women among them reported an experience which effectively raised Jesus back to life (MT 28:1-10; MK 16: 1-8; LK 24:1-11). He was more intensely present, they said, than before his execution. Their tales changed everything.
But what was the exact nature of the resurrection? Did it involve a resuscitated corpse? Or was it something more spiritual, psychic, visionary and prophetic?
In Paul (the only 1st person report we have – written around 50 C.E.) the experience of resurrection is clearly visionary. Paul sees a light and hears a voice, but for him there is no embodiment of the risen Jesus. When Paul reports his experience (I COR 15: 3-8) he equates his vision with the resurrection manifestations to others claiming to have encountered the risen Christ. Paul writes “Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me.” In fact, even though Paul never met the historical Jesus, he claims that he too is an “apostle” specifically because he shared the same resurrection experience as the companions of Jesus who were known by that name. This implies that at best the other resurrection appearances might also be accurately described as visionary rather than as physical.
The evangelists support this conclusion. The earliest Gospel account of a “resurrection” is found in Mark, Ch. 16. There a “young man” (not an angel) announces Jesus’ resurrection to a group of women (!) who had come to Jesus’ tomb to anoint his body (16: 5-8). But there is no encounter with the risen Jesus. In fact, Mark’s account actually ends without any narrations of resurrection appearances at all. (According to virtually all scholarly analysis, the “appearances” found in chapter 16 were added by a later editor.)
In Mark’s original ending, the women are told by the young man to go back to Jerusalem and tell Peter and the others. But they fail to do so, because of their great fear (16: 8). This means that in Mark not only are there no resurrection appearances, but the resurrection itself goes un-proclaimed. This in turn indicates either that Mark didn’t know about such appearances or did not think them important enough to include!
Resurrection appearances make their own appearance in Matthew (writing about 80) and in Luke (about 85) with increasing detail. But always there is some initial difficulty in recognizing Jesus. For instance Matthew 28: 11-20 says, “Now the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed them. And when they saw him they worshipped him; but some doubted.” So the disciples saw Jesus, but not everyone present was sure they did. In Luke 24: 13-53, two disciples walk seven miles with the risen Jesus without recognizing him until the three break bread together.
Even in John’s gospel (published about 90) Mary Magdalene (the woman with the most intimate relationship to Jesus) thinks she’s talking to a gardener when the risen Jesus appears to her (20: 11-18). In the same gospel, the apostle Thomas does not recognize the risen Jesus until he touches the wounds on Jesus’ body (JN 26-29). When Jesus appears to disciples at the Sea of Tiberius, they at first think he is a fishing kibitzer giving them instructions about where to find the most fish (JN 21: 4-8).
All of this raises questions about the nature of the “resurrection.” Once again, it doesn’t seem to have been resuscitation of a corpse. What then was it? Was it the community coming to realize the truth of Jesus’ words, “Whatever you do to the least of my brethren, you do to me” (MT 25:45) or “Wherever two or three are gathered together in my name, I am there in their midst” (MT 18:20)? Do the resurrection stories reveal a Lord’s Supper phenomenon where Jesus’ early followers experienced his intense presence “in the breaking of the bread” (LK 24:30-32)?
Regardless of whether one believes in resurrection as resuscitation of Jesus’ dead body or as a metaphor about the spiritual presence of God in communities resisting empire and serving the poor, the question must be answered, “What does resurrection mean?”
It’s here that Pope Francis helps us. In The Joy of the Gospel (JG), he relates the resurrection accounts, (whatever their factual basis) to our own despair – just as real and hopeless as that of Jesus’ bereft disciples. Francis writes to encourage us who might be worn down and hopeless in the face of a world:
• Pervaded by consumerism and pleasure-seeking without conscience (JG 2)
• Governed by merciless competition and social Darwinism (53)
• Economically organized by failed “trickle-down” ideologies which idolize money (54, 55)
• Controlled by murderers (53) and thieves (57, 189)
• Torn apart by wars and violence (99)
• Rooted in growing income inequality which is the root of all social ills (202), including destruction of the environment and its defenseless non-human animate life (215)
In the face of all that, here’s what Francis says:
“Christ’s resurrection is not an event of the past; it contains a vital power which has permeated this world. Where all seems to be dead, signs of the resurrection suddenly spring up. It is an irresistible force. Often it seems that God does not exist: all around us we see persistent injustice, evil, indifference and cruelty. But it is also true that in the midst of darkness something new always springs to life and sooner or later produces fruit. On razed land life breaks through, stubbornly yet invincibly. However dark things are, goodness always re-emerges and spreads. Each day in our world beauty is born anew, it rises transformed through the storms of history. Values always tend to reappear under new guises, and human beings have arisen time after time from situations that seemed doomed. Such is the power of the resurrection.” (276)
Here the pope says that the power and meaning of Jesus’ resurrection is not found in the past. Neither is there reference here to the resuscitation of the Lord’s body. Instead, the pope explains the resurrection in terms of a story that calls attention to the persistent power of Life itself:
* Of nature and spring after a long cold winter
* Of goodness in a world that seems governed by evil
* Of light where darkness reigns unabated
* Of justice where injustice is simply taken for granted
* Of beauty where ugliness is worshipped as its opposite
* And of hope over despair.
No need for despondency, the pope says. Despite appearances, Life and its irresistible forces are on our side! They will not – they cannot – be controlled even by imperial agents of death as powerful as the Rome that assassinated Jesus or the United States whose economic and military policies are butchering the planet.
Even post moderns, skeptics and agnostics can embrace a story with a spring time message like that.
Resurrection is a law of the universe. That’s the pope’s message.
So despite everything, be happy! it’s spring! Life goes on! Jesus has indeed risen!
7 thoughts on “(Easter Sunday Homily) Did Jesus Really Rise from the Dead? Here’s the Answer of Pope Francis”
Nice Easter gift Mike.
Excellent article. Thank you.
I would probably have preferred the last line to read –
“Christ has indeed risen” – more all embracing and connective for our splintered world.
Wishing you and family a happy Easter
Thank you, Jim. Happy Easter to you and your family too. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate all the help and support you’ve given me.
Perhaps you should have started with section 275. “If we think things are not going to change, we need to recall that Jesus Christ has triumphed over sin and death and is now almighty. Jesus Christ truly lives. Put another way: ‘If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain’ (1 Cor 15: 14)….Christ, risen and glorified is the wellspring of our hope,…” Now read the first sentence of 276!
Thanks for the note, Gene. I agree that sequence might have been better. Yes (as the pope says) the resurrection is not an event of the past. Its reality can be experienced every day. And, of course, it’s not a resuscitated body we experience each day, but Christ’s presence in one another and in the world itself. Resurrection is a power image and metaphor for that important reality without which our faith indeed would be in vain.
As Flannery O’Connor said about the Eucharist at that party of intellectuals in NY, “if it’s only a metaphor, to Hell with it.” The same is true here. As Paul says in the quote Francis cited, if he didn’t really come out of the tomb, historically, if you will, our faith is in vain. My faith isn’t in vain; He came out of the tomb, really, truly.
Bravo, Gene Startzman. Ditto here. For God to create a universe that still has scientists and astronomers guessing and postulating theory after theory, as well as creating a human being unique and perfect down to the most minute detail, why is it so damn difficult for us to believe that He died and arose three days later as He promised He would????????
Instead of theoretically discussing or arguing the validity of Christ Jesus’ historical bodily resurrection and the significance of the empty tomb, let’s get on with the job that He left for us to continue. For starters: build His Kingdom here on earth, ease the suffering and sense of abandonment and hopelessness of our brothers and sisters, and spread the Good News to the ends of the earth. To do anything else is to deny Jesus’ promises, discredit his teachings, and His mind-boggling redeeming death for us — all of us!
Hi Alice. Well said. I have just read a marvelous book by Anthony Esolen which you might like: Reflections on the Christian Life. Here is a section on the resurrection: “We do not simply say, ‘Jesus rose from he dead.’ Yes, he did, but we mean more. We mean that death has no more dominion over Him. He died once and dies no more. He is risen: His Resurrection from the dead is not an event that happened and is past, but is the defining event for all mankind, now and forever” (145). Amen. And he goes on from there.