(Sunday Homily) Zionists Are Weeds in the Garden of Palestine


The entire world stands aghast at the cruelty of Israel’s vicious and illegal collective punishment of Palestinian civilians for the perceived “crimes” of Hamas – the group of Palestinian resisters committed to the expulsion of illegal Zionist occupiers from the Palestinian homeland.

Today’s liturgy of the word implores the Zionists to abandon their butchery.

It also challenges Christians to denounce such ethnic cleansing and to withdraw the last vestiges of support for a group that more resembles their former Nazi persecutors than the “People of God” celebrated in the Hebrew Bible.

At the same time, today’s readings support rabbi Michael Lerner in cautioning Hamas against its policy of violent resistance. Though many of us would agree that Hamas’ tactics are understandable and often justified by principles of self-defense, today’s Gospel reading identifies them as counterproductive and ultimately harmful to the very people Hamas seeks to defend.

Instead, Jesus suggests that violent resistance should be replaced by greater reliance on more subtle and patient strategies. Such strategies are reflected in the three basic themes of today’s readings. They emphasize (1) the power of God expressed in leniency and forgiveness, (2) the futility of violent response to unwanted foreign presence, and (3) resistance that takes the form of patient trust that God’s forgiving power will prevail. In succession, the themes suggest challenges for Jewish Zionists, Palestinians, and Christians.

Begin with the first reading from the Jewish Testament’s Book of Wisdom. It is particularly relevant to Zionist Jews. The reading says explicitly that God’s power is not expressed in violence but in leniency to all, Jew and non-Jew alike.

That theme is repeated in today’s responsorial psalm with equal relevance to Zionists. There God is described as belonging to all nations. The divine Spirit, as Paul insists in today’s second reading, dwells within all humans regardless of nationality. It is slow to anger, good, forgiving, abounding in kindness.

From this, Jewish wisdom insists that the “People of God” must in turn be kind, lenient and forgiving to all – presumably even to their worst enemies. There is no room here for exceptions involving the indigenous tribal people of Palestine.

The second theme of today’s liturgy enjoys direct relevance to contemporary Palestinians. Whether they are Muslims or Christians (and many are Christians), they also recognize the Bible as the Word of God. I point to Palestinian relevance because this second theme addresses the question of resisting illegal occupation.

That is, Jesus’ parable of the weeds planted by an enemy in a landlord’s field can be read as addressing the Roman occupation forces encumbering Israel during Jesus’ lifetime. [According to John Dominic Crossan, Matthew’s allegorizing of Jesus’ parable – making it about the end of the world – is more reflective of the situation of the Jewish diaspora (following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 CE) than of the actual revolutionary situation of Jesus’ own day.]

In occupied Israel, the suffocating Roman presence was as unwelcome, alien, and destructive as weeds in a garden or field. It was like the presence of basically European Zionist colonizers who have encumbered Palestinian land since their colonial invasion in 1948.

The question was how to deal with such odious foreign presence. Zealot revolutionaries had their answer: Uproot the weeds here and now. Take up arms; assassinate Romans and their collaborators; drive them out mercilessly. Be as cruel and vicious as the Romans.

Jesus’ response was different. As a non-violent revolutionary, he could surely understand the more apocalyptic strategy. After all, much of his teaching expressed sympathy to the Zealot cause which included land reform, debt forgiveness, and expulsion of the hated Roman occupation forces. Many scripture scholars even identify possibly five members of Jesus’ inner circle as Zealots themselves.

But Jesus’ Parable of the Weeds is more prudent and sensitive to civilian casualties than the strategy of the impatient Zealots – or that of Hamas.

When the landlord’s workers ask, “Should we uproot the weeds?” Jesus’ landlord answers: “No, if you pull up the weeds you might uproot the wheat along with them.”

In other words, Jesus agrees with El Salvador’s Oscar Romero and with Brazil’s Dom Helder Camara that revolutionary violence, though understandable (and justifiable on the grounds of just war theory), is imprudent at the very least.

This is because when faced with a vicious, overwhelmingly armed oppressor (like the Zionist state) resistance inevitably leads to state terrorism – to the war crime of collective punishment impacting women, children, the elderly and disabled. At the very least, that’s why Jesus eschews Zealot violence.

How then respond to illegal occupation like Rome’s in the 1st century or Israel’s over the last more than 60 years?

Jesus’ response? Be like mustard plant, he says. Be like yeast in flour. Both puzzling recommendations are relevant not only to Palestinians, but to Christians who wish to help their brothers and sisters in Palestine against the Zionists-turned-Nazis.

First of all think of the puzzlement that must have struck Jesus’ listeners. Jews didn’t have much use for yeast. They preferred unleavened bread. Neither would any farmer sow mustard seeds in her field or garden. The mustard plant was like kudzu – itself a kind of weed that eventually can take over entire fields and mountainsides while choking out other plants weeds or not. The mustard plant was unstoppable.

So Jesus is saying:

 * The Romans are weeds in your garden.
 * Don’t try to uproot them.
 * That will only lead to slaughter of the innocent.
 * Rather become weeds yourselves – like the mustard plant which is much more powerful than simple Roman (or Zionist) weeds.
 * Resist the Romans by embodying the Spirit of God that is slow to anger, good, forgiving, abounding in kindness.
 * Only imitation of Wisdom’s God can defeat the evil of imperialism.

What does that mean for Christians wishing to express solidarity with Palestinians against their cruel oppressors? At least the following:

 * Reject U.S. militarism in general as counterproductive, since fully 90% of the casualties it inflicts in war are civilians.
 * To bring about change, be instead like the yeast a homemaker puts into 60 pounds of flour, “infecting” the greater culture by non-violent resistance rather than seeking to destroy enemies.
 * Recognize the Zionists for what they are: an outlaw European “settler society” illegally occupying Palestinian land.
 * Take sides with Palestine’s indigenous tribal People.
 * Recognize them for what they are: “the Jews’ Jews” – treated by Zionists in the same way the Nazis treated Jews in Germany.
 * Petition the U.S. government to withdraw its support of Israel (more than one million dollars per day) unless the Zionists obey UN Resolution 242 and abandon the occupied territory while tearing down the odious Wall of Shame protecting the illegal Zionist settlements.
 * Support boycotts of Israel’s products by not buying them and by urging our churches and places of business to do the same.

Surely Jesus’ Way of non-violent resistance, forgiveness and love of enemies will strike many (non-believers and believers alike) as unrealistic. But according to the faith we Christians pretend to embrace, Jesus’ Way is God’s way.

But then perhaps we think we’re smarter and more realistic than Jesus — or God?

Published by

Mike Rivage-Seul's Blog

Emeritus professor of Peace & Social Justice Studies. Liberation theologian. Activist. Former R.C. priest. Married for 45 years. Three grown children. Six grandchildren.

6 thoughts on “(Sunday Homily) Zionists Are Weeds in the Garden of Palestine”

  1. Well, Mike, you are truly ‘on fire’ with the words of the Holy Spirit speaking through you — similar to the Hebrew prophets millennia ago and our own prophets who have spoken and continue to speak to us today . And – again – we are not listening; we do not want to hear.

    History tells us, however, that Israel did not heed their prophets’ warnings and paid a tragic price for their recalcitrance. By the grace of their loving Yahweh, a remnant survived. It appears that history will repeat itself. Israel will once again have to answer to Yahweh for their inhumane and illegal actions against the Palestinians for the 50 years since Israel was rightly recognized as a state.

    America and her religious entities — those who profess to follow the Law of God — often with forked tongue and sickening hypocrisy — will not be overlooked for their complicity in this intolerable situation. They, too, will be judged for their sins of omission (silence) and commission (funding and economic support)) and will pay a price.

    The good news is that, once again, a remnant will survive and will work together in peace and solidarity to help usher in the ‘New Jerusalem’ and the Kingdom that Jesus the Christ has promised. True to His Word, He has not left us without hope!


  2. Please consider your statement about “taking sides”. Maybe, Berea College and John G. Fee got it right way back in the day, when they proclaimed “God has made of one blood all peoples of the earth”.

    When my maternal grandfather was a newlywed, quartered in a French schoolhouse during the stalemate period of World War I, he used some of his idle time to read French school textbooks. Textbooks like the famous “Petit Lavisse”: http://www.academia.edu/2651024/The_Nation_According_to_Lavisse_Teaching_Masculinity_and_Male_Citizenship_in_Third-_Republic_France._French_Cultural_Studies_18.1_2007_31-57

    Opa was a German citizen and German army officer. His family, like many others, came from varied background. People have been moving around on the world for as long as humankind has existed.

    Opa was startled by what he read in the French children’s schoolbooks. French children had been taught that they were “inherited enemies” of Germans, that future war was inevitable to regain contested territory. German authorities had copied the “Petit Lavisse” in a German version, and children had been taught to prepare themselves for war. No surprise, this huge misery came to pass, wasting an entire generation of innocents, and generating even more bloodshed later.

    Opa noted that the young people had all been set up for war by schoolteaching adults who were supposedly acting in the best interests of the nation. These authorities were the ‘intelligentsia’, even, supposedly brighter than the hoi polloi. These intellectuals knew how to divide people up and get them to kill each other! The leaders made lessons in hate and conflict sound glorious and romantic. The reality did not match the theories, though.

    In 2014, you probably marvel at the odd notion that French and German people are destined to be at war with each other. (Additionally, both France and Germany have absorbed a great many people who are not…ahem…”indigenous”, as have most other countries around the globe).

    There is inconsistency in advocating that some leaders of the world would be noble to engage in ethnic cleansing, while others should not, according to arbitrary academic notions concerning ethnicity.

    If the Holy Spirit is among us, maybe that Spirit of wisdom and healing and sanity speaks through this man, Dr. Abuleish. He’s only one man and he speaks from Canada, but may God strengthen him http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/18/father-children-gaza-bloodshed-palestinians-israelis#start-of-comments


  3. Hi Mike
    Only one word for this – absolutely courageous!
    I still live in fear of Big Brother.
    I always go to a greater mind when I run out of my own…..towith – I have learned from Chomsky years ago the US could stop the Palestine atrocity with a snap of the finger if they wanted too and also the north south Korean conflict but suffer the little children in the national interest – God Help us!
    Also Mike I feel you use the word Christianity lightly sometimes as there are a lot of nutters flying that banner – especially in the US, where we all still look to for relative freedom. God help us!
    Still on the run in Ireland


  4. Re: romanticizing “indigenous people” …. in this clip, Britishwoman Stacey Dooley talks (respectfully) with a lot of people, some who are “indigenous” to Luton (and others, “Asians” who are less “indigenous” to the European continent, although everyone who is featured, speaks in English). Where do YOU stand on issues of “Auslander Raus?” (German for “foreigners out”? a sentiment usually attributed to Skinheads, but you’re okay with kicking “Europeans” out of Israel?) What makes it possible for people to get along, while others come into conflict? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgKMI1wV0ps


    1. I agree with you, Mary. Openness to immigrants represents a long and hallowed biblical tradition. But when immigrants come as conquerors and colonialists, they should be resisted and ultimately expelled — by the indigenous who need not be romanticized to exercise their right to sovereignty.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s