As everyone knows, hurricane Harvey struck Houston, the 4th largest city in the United States, last week. Apart from its obvious devastation, initial reports said Harvey had caused at least 12 deaths across an area that is home to more than 6 million people.
What most don’t know is that on the other side of the world, in Bangladesh, India and Nepal people are currently experiencing 100 times the initially reported Houston death toll. There torrential rains have killed more than 1200 people and wreaked havoc in the lives of up to 40 million South Asians living in those countries. One third of Bangladesh is currently under water.
At the same time, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have recently published a warning that the parts of Asia just referenced (as well as Pakistan) will soon become uninhabitable for its 1.5 billion residents because of rising temperatures. Incessant heat waves will soon make it impossible for peasant farmers to work their fields. The predictable result will be famine and unimaginable loss of life.
Despite such climate events and dire warnings, there are three terms Americans will scarcely hear mentioned in media reporting of these disasters. The first two are “climate change” and “profit.” The third is especially relevant to a Sunday homily like this. It is a person’s name. The name is “Pope Francis.” In fact, I’ll wager that this Sunday you’ll not hear him or his encyclical Laudato Si’ (LS) mentioned in connection with Hurricane Harvey even in most Catholic Churches. And that sad fact (despite Pope Francis’ brave efforts) simply underlines the irrelevance to which the church has been reduced.
Begin by considering the silence of our leaders and media about “climate change,” “global warming,” or “climate chaos.” Even during non-stop TV coverage of Harvey, the terms hardly crossed the lips of commentators. That’s because virtually alone in the world, the United States (and its media enablers) stand in aggressive denial of the obvious fact that the “American” economy and way of life remain the major causes of such disasters. (Even the Chinese contribution to climate chaos is largely induced by U.S. factories relocated there.)
In fact, far from admitting its criminal and willful ignorance, the Republican-controlled presidency and congress are moving in the exact opposite direction of that required to address super-hurricanes (like Katrina, Sandy, and now Harvey), as well as torrential flooding, disintegrating icebergs, rising sea levels, and soaring temperatures. Setting itself in opposition to the entire world, our country has withdrawn from the landmark Paris Climate Accord, and is doubling down on the production and use of the dirtiest fuels at human disposal (including coal) .
Additionally, hardly a day goes by without our president threatening nuclear war. As Jonathan Schell pointed out even before most of us were aware of climate change, that event would also have devastating effect on the earth’s atmosphere aggravating the climate syndrome already so well under way.
So you don’t hear much these days about climate chaos and the devastating effects of climate change denial. The reason? That brings me to the second culturally unpronounceable word: “profit.” In fact, as Noam Chomsky points out, that word is so unspeakable that it must now be pronounced and spelled as j-o-b-s. Nevertheless, we all know, the real reason for climate denial isn’t jobs, but capital accumulation. That is, corporations like Rex Tillerson’s Exxon are willing to destroy the planet, rather than respond appropriately to the climate impacts of their products that their own research uncovered decades ago.
Pope Francis has recognized the deception and hypocrisy of it all. And that’s why his name along with climate change and profit, is unmentionable in connection with Harvey. Yet, more than two years ago, Francis wrote an entire encyclical addressing the problem. (Encyclicals are the most solemn form of official teaching a pope can produce.) Still, his dire warnings remain largely ignored even by “devout Catholic leaders” such as Paul Ryan and his Republican cohorts. Even worse, the pope’s words generally go unreferenced by pastors in their Sunday homilies.
Yet the pope’s words are powerfully relevant to Harvey, Sandy, and Katrina – to Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. For instance, in section 161 of Laudato Si’ Francis says,
“Doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain. We may well be leaving to coming generations debris, desolation and filth. The pace of consumption, waste, and environmental change has so stretched the planet’s capacity that our contemporary lifestyle, unsustainable as it is, can only precipitate catastrophes such as those which even now periodically occur in different areas of the world. The effects of the present imbalance can only be reduced by our decisive action here and now. We need to reflect on our accountability before those who will have to endure the dire consequences.”
And what are the “here and now” “decisive actions” the pope called for? Chief among them is the necessity for all nations of the world to submit to international bodies with binding legislative powers to protect rainforests, oceans and endangered species, as well as to promote sustainable agriculture (LS 53, 173-175).
That, of course, is exactly what the Exxons of the world fear most. Such submission threatens jobs profits. But realities much more important than jobs profits are at stake here. We’re talking about the survival of human life as we know it.
This is a matter of faith. It is a matter of basic decency and common sense.
In fact, Hurricane Harvey and the other climate disasters I’ve just mentioned remind us of the most dreadful papal observation of all. “God always forgives,” Pope Francis has said. “Human beings sometimes forgive. But nature never forgives.”
Last week’s events in Texas demonstrate that truth. Mother Nature is angry, and She’s coming after us.
Are we listening?
4 thoughts on “(Sunday Homily) Hurricane Harvey and Its Three Unspeakable Descriptors”
Obviously we are not listening – most of us. Our so-called education plus the media have trained us not to listen. Actually Pope Francis was not frightening enough in his pronouncements. What we are actually facing is the extinction of humanity in the near future. Most people would regard this as doom saying fantasy with no basis in scientific fact. These are people who have not looked at the evidence presented by the most honest and most courageous scientists.
Well-said, Mike. Denial of the climate-change facts seems centered here in the United States. World-wide, the awareness is much higher. And you’re right the mainstream media, our miseducation, and the Catholic Church’s failure to embrace “Laudato Si'” are all responsible for ignorance in this country.
In THE BEATITUDES OF PEACE John Dear points out that, when we read about Jesus saying blessed are the meek for they will inherit the earth, it makes perfect sense to associate meekness with living a humble, simple life in harmony with nature = just as indigenous people have done since before the beginning of recorded history. The opposite of meekness would be arrogant plundering of the earth for short term profit – taking more than is necessary and ignoring long term consequences.
Global warming is real. It is caused by human greed and arrogance towards Mother Earth. Though global warming is slow, storms are already worse because warmer water and warmer air cause more moisture to be in the clouds.
Morality isn’t just about how human beings treat one another on a person to person basis. It is also about regional, national, and global problems that are systemic and require political action. “Do unto others” means do unto flora and fauna and mountains and oceans as you would want to have done to yourself. And it means caring about the implications of global capitalism on people in far off distant lands. It is a sin to consider their lives less valuable than those of our own land.
I am not a Catholic but I have read Laudato Si and admire it enormously.
Your words, Larry, are always so thoughtful and completely on-target. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate your sharing them. I love John Dear’s “translation” of the Beatitudes’ term “meek.” He calls it “non-violent.” “Gentle” and “humble” are also accurate. Thanks again.