Paulo Freire: The Friend Who Taught Us to See Differently

On our eighth wedding anniversary, Peggy and I had dinner in São Paulo with Paulo Freire and his wife, Elza. Afterward, one of the world’s great educators read aloud from Peggy’s unfinished doctoral dissertation on Freire himself. At one point, he encountered a lengthy quotation from his own work. He paused and exclaimed in English, “Right now, I am loving these words.”

I still remember that moment. There was something wonderfully unguarded about it: a thinker rediscovering his own thought through the work of a student who had become his friend. For me, it captures something essential about Paulo. Learning remained an encounter, even when the words being encountered were his own.

That memory returned recently when a friend, an editor at OpEdNews, asked about our relationship with Freire. He had just seen Reading the World, the new documentary directed by Catherine Murphy and Iris de Oliveira. Knowing that Peggy and I had a long history with its subject, he wanted to hear more.

Our story began before Peggy and I knew each other. Separately, we had read Pedagogy of the Oppressed. It helped shape us as students and eventually as teachers. Looking back, I would say that Paulo entered our marriage before we ever met him.

His book’s brilliant title suggested two meanings to me. First, it concerned an education through which oppressed people could acquire literacy and participate more fully in public life. In Brazil, where literacy was a condition of voting, teaching people to read could change the electorate. At Angicos in 1963, approximately 300 people became literate through 40 hours of instruction spread over several weeks. Education was opening a political door previously closed to them.

The title’s second meaning was even more challenging: the oppressed themselves have something indispensable to teach the rest of us. People who endure hunger, exploitation, exclusion, and humiliation know things about society that comfortable people can spend their lives avoiding. Their experience raises questions that respectable institutions often discourage. Why are some hungry while others accumulate fortunes? Who benefits from the arrangements we are taught to consider natural?

Education begins to become revolutionary when those questions enter the classroom. For Peggy and me, that meant reconsidering our authority as teachers. Students arrived with knowledge acquired through their families, work, struggles, and communities. Our responsibility included helping them examine that knowledge—and allowing it to challenge our own.

When we married in 1976, we were both working at Berea College. Over the ensuing years, our reading and teaching included Neil Postman and Charles Weingartner’s Teaching as a Subversive Activity, Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States, James W. Loewen’s Lies My Teacher Told Me, and books recovering Black history and women’s history. Frances Moore Lappé and Joseph Collins’s Food First further challenged our assumptions about hunger and poverty.

Freire supplied a thread connecting those works. Each invited us to examine the world from perspectives pushed to its margins. Each questioned the innocence of conventional education.

Then, in 1982, we attended a weeklong seminar led by Freire at Boston University. At the time, Peggy was pursuing her doctorate in philosophy of education at the University of Kentucky. Her dissertation explored Paulo Freire and moral imagination: our capacity to envision human possibilities beyond the arrangements we have inherited. She approached Paulo and asked whether she might study with him at his center in São Paulo. He warmly encouraged her.

That invitation changed our lives. During my first sabbatical at Berea and still studying Portuguese, we went to Brazil in 1984. Peggy’s dissertation was already well underway. She studied at Freire’s center and worked directly with literacy teams in the city’s favelas. There, the questions raised by his books belonged to people’s daily lives. Words emerged from experience. Learning to read involved examining the conditions under which people worked, raised children, found shelter, and struggled to survive.

Meanwhile, I enrolled in a liberation theology seminar that placed Freire’s methods at the center of biblical reflection. I found myself sitting at the feet of theologians I had been studying for years. They helped me understand how “Base Christian Communities” used Freire’s methods in “biblical circles” to consider their efforts to follow Jesus. Their reading connected Scripture with high rents, inadequate water, starvation wages, and government repression.

Those connections transformed the questions brought to the Bible. What did Exodus mean to people seeking freedom? What did Jesus’ good news to the poor require in a neighborhood where families could barely eat? How might faith help people organize to change their circumstances? The poor were becoming interpreters of a tradition too often explained to them by others.

In 1984, Brazil was still under military rule. Freire had already experienced the consequences of awakening such questioning. After the 1964 coup, he had been imprisoned for 70 days. The authorities understood that people learning to name their circumstances might also begin to change them.

During our stay, Peggy and I came to know Paulo and Elza personally. That friendship gave a human face to ideas that had already transformed our work. Our anniversary evening remains its clearest expression. Paulo’s willingness to read Peggy’s developing dissertation aloud conveyed attention, encouragement, and intellectual generosity. The renowned educator took a student’s work seriously enough to enter into it with her. Her dissertation later received national recognition from the American Educational Research Association (AERA). But that evening offered a recognition of its own.

Our friendship continued after we returned to the United States. More than once, we attended workshops with Paulo and Myles Horton at the Highlander Folk School in New Market, Tennessee. We also became friends with Freirean scholars Henry Giroux and Peter McLaren, who helped us publish two books after Paulo’s death in 1997. The relationships continued the learning.

Today, when I think about Paulo Freire, I return to a question that has followed me through decades of teaching, writing, and theological reflection: whose experience helps us see what we have been missing? For Peggy and me, his answer led toward the poor and oppressed—and toward classrooms where teachers could also learn.

I remember the great thinker at his apartment, reading Peggy’s pages and delighting in words that still had the power to surprise him. That openness was part of his greatness. He helped us understand that a teacher’s work begins again whenever another person helps us see differently.

My Study of Liberation Theology in Brazil (10th in a series on critical thinking)

Dom Helder

My study in Brazil initiated a profound change in my understanding of critical thinking. It led me to see that liberation theology itself amounted to a Global South version of that discipline. However, the critical thinking I encountered in Brazil didn’t concern itself with abstract dilemmas and logical fallacies. Instead the Brazilian version addressed problems confronted in the very lives of its protagonists – hunger, poverty, dictatorships, imprisonment, torture, police raids, and the reasons for widespread hunger in an extremely rich and rather thinly populated country.

Neither did critical thinking in Brazil worry about neutrality and balance or with giving equal time to capitalists and their working class opponents. In the minds of its teachers, those problems had long since been settled. After all, in 1964, defenders of capitalism had overthrown Brazil’s democratically elected government. In the 1960s that had been the case throughout the region. In Brazil it meant that by 1984 the country had completed its second decade of a military dictatorship fully supported by the United States. Over those years, vast numbers of priests and nuns, union organizers, university professors, social workers, lawyers, and simple peasants had been routinely imprisoned, tortured and often murdered. Their crimes?  They had demanded land reform, higher wages, health care, education, freedom of speech, and ability to speak freely and organize. No, capitalism in Brazil and elsewhere in Latin America had clearly shown itself to be the enemy of the people.

All of that became very clear for me when, to begin with, I connected with the legendary Brazilian educator, Paulo Freire. Freire’s methodology for teaching literacy had exercised strong influence on liberation theology, and especially on “Base Christian Communities” (BCCs) which following the Second Vatican Council (1962-’65) proliferated throughout the country. My intention was to research those communities as part of my sabbatical assignment.

At the same time, my wife, Peggy was working on her doctoral dissertation on Freire’s work. So she worked in his center every day and every week with literacy teachers implementing his method in Sao Paulo’s favelas. On our fifth wedding anniversary, we had supper with Paulo and his wife, Elsa, in their apartment. Afterwards, he read aloud Peggy’s latest dissertation chapter. I remember him pausing at one point after reading a quotation from his own Education for Critical Consciousness; he said, “Right now I am loving these words!” He was wonderful.

While in Recife, our whole family twice visited Dom Helder Camara, the famous “Red Archbishop” of that huge city in the northern part of the country. I phoned his office to set up the appointment. He answered the phone himself!

Considered a saint even before his death in 1999, Dom Helder was also called the “Archbishop of the Poor.” He once famously observed “When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.” With those words, this patron of liberation theology expressed the central question of critical thinking in the Global South: Why are people so poor in the midst of so much abundance?

I informed Dom Helder of my intention to experience liberation theology’s BCCs in Recife. That was during our first visit in his office, while he held our four-year-old daughter, Maggie, in his lap. (I later told her she had been embraced by a saint!) I asked the archbishop to share his thoughts about those communities. He told me, “It would be better for me not to say anything at this point. Why don’t you do your research first? Experience those communities, and then at the end of your visit come back and tell me what you found. Then I might tell you what I think.”

So I followed the saint’s advice. During our family’s weeks in Recife, I participated in several BCC meetings. There I witnessed the kind of critical thinking referenced above. It was the same process that had been prescribed for teaching literacy years earlier by Paulo Freire in his famous Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which I had read while still in Rome.

I consistently found all of that inspiring. Here were absolute giants in the field of critical thought, centralizing their fundamental identities as spiritual beings in order to address in practical terms genuine problems of politics, economy, and personal life. I found such embrace of human political spirituality absent not only in the standard approach to critical thinking familiar to me, but even in the churches of my own experience.

I wanted to know more about the underpinnings of that approach to critical thinking.

To that end, I enrolled in a semester-long seminar taught by liberation theologians, philosophers and scripture scholars I had been reading for years – figures like Argentina’s Enrique Dussel, Chile’s Pablo Richard, Belgium’s Francois Houtart and Brazil’s own Frei Gilberto Gorgulho and Ana Flora Anderson. In the course of the experience, I was also introduced to the work of Chilean economist and theologian, Franz Hinkelammert, who would become for me an extremely important mentor. Significantly, Franz was to later found the international Grupo de Pensamiento Critico (the Critical Thinking Group).

As I listened to these scholars describe history in ways I never had confidence enough to seriously entertain, I found myself wondering, “What is the key to all of this?” I mean, Enrique Dussel described World War II as the “Second Inter-Capitalist War.” What is he talking about? I wondered. Was Hitler really a capitalist? It was a completely foreign thought.

Meanwhile, Frei Gorgulho spoke of Cuba as “the envy of the Third World.” Pablo Richard had just returned from a trip to revolutionary Nicaragua and was full of stories about Anastasio Somoza, the history of U.S. oppression in the country, the Sandinistas, land reform, and the U.S.-supported counter-revolutionary Contras. The positive evaluation of Cuba and the Nicaraguan revolution stood contrary to everything reported in the U.S.

Even more disturbingly, everyone constantly and negatively referenced highly destructive American military interventions in its “backyard” and throughout the world to defend colonialism and what was termed “neo-colonialism.” The whole seminar was scandalized by a picture in the Folha do Sao Paulo of President Reagan and Pope John Paul II sitting together in Rome – both of them smiling broadly. “That photo,” all agreed “will cost thousands of lives in Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Guatemala.” (It was because it implied that the pope endorsed Reagan’s genocidal wars in Central America.)

None of these thoughts would ever be expressed in the United States. But here they were bandied about by these teachers of pensamiento critical as though they were perfectly obvious. And there was no objection from my classmates – most of them priests, nuns and lay theologians.

Again, I wondered, what is the analytic key to this sort of thought.

I later found it was the dependency theory of the German-American sociologist and historian, Andre Gunder Frank. Gunder Frank traced everything back to the history and structures of colonialism and neo-colonialism. I resolved to find out more about that; it seemed essential to this kind of critical thought. I asked for sources. Other than Gunder Frank’s works themselves, my seminar colleagues told me to read Eduardo Galeano’s The Open Veins of Latin America. For perspective on Africa, they recommended Walter Rodney’s How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. I immediately purchased the books and my education in critical thinking took another giant step forward.

To repeat: this was not the type of critical thinking I had become used to. Unlike its U.S. version, what I found in Brazil was politically committed, historically grounded, and deeply spiritual. In the United States, everything familiar to me was apolitical, historically uninformed, and entirely secular. That caused me to reflect once again on my own historical ignorance. I also wondered about neutrality and the stories about Nicaragua routinely disseminated back home. I could already see that those tales amounted to one-sided propaganda. As one of my Ten Rules would later express it, I was beginning to suspect that truly critical thought involved rejecting pretense of neutrality.

I resolved to visit Nicaragua as soon as possible. I did the following year.

(Next week: Nicaragua!)